Phil Scott
Impact in
- Small Animals top 0.5%
- Helminth infection and control
- Animal health and immunology
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Microbiology top 2%
- Microbial infections and disease research
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Animal health and immunology 24
- Infectious Diseases and Mycology 13
- Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies 11
- Helminth infection and control 11
- Equine 9
- Co-authors
- Neil Sargison (32 shared papers)C. D. Penny (24 shared papers)David J. Wilson (6 shared papers)R. S. Pirie (7 shared papers)Chris Cousens (4 shared papers)Alastair Macrae (5 shared papers)J. Eastham (4 shared papers)J. M. Kelly (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Veterinary Record (47 papers)The Veterinary Journal (13 papers)Small Ruminant Research (11 papers)Scientific American (4 papers)Theriogenology (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaHungary
In The Last Decade
Phil Scott
150 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Small Animals 671
- Microbiology 53
- Agronomy and Crop Science 438
- Equine 68
- Microbiology 135
Countries citing papers authored by Phil Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Phil Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phil Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phil Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Phil Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phil Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phil Scott. The network helps show where Phil Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phil Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 158 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 49 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 40 | |
| 3 | 1995 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 35 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 34 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 33 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 33 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 30 | |
| 10 | 1989 | 30 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 30 | |
| 12 | 1996 | 27 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 26 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 26 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 25 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 25 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 25 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 25 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 24 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 24 |
About Phil Scott
Phil Scott is a scholar working on Small Animals, Equine, Agronomy and Crop Science, Microbiology and Microbiology, having authored 158 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (25 papers), Animal health and immunology (24 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (21 papers), Infectious Diseases and Mycology (13 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (11 papers), Helminth infection and control (11 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (10 papers) and Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (671 citations), Microbiology (53 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (438 citations), Equine (68 citations) and Microbiology (135 citations). Phil Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Neil Sargison, C. D. Penny, David J. Wilson, R. S. Pirie, Chris Cousens, Alastair Macrae, J. Eastham, J. M. Kelly, David Collie and Brian Aldridge. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Record, The Veterinary Journal, Small Ruminant Research, Scientific American and Theriogenology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.