Peter Weber
Impact in
-
- Epilepsy research and treatment
-
- Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Papers in
-
- Epilepsy research and treatment 2
- Migraine and Headache Studies 2
-
- Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders 2
- Co-authors
- E. François AldrichWayne N. CrowJürg LütschgRitu KapurRichard S. ZimmermanMartha J. MorrellMadjid SamiiRyder P. Gwinn
- Journals
- Acta Paediatrica (2 papers)Journal of neurosurgery (2 papers)Neuropediatrics (2 papers)Brain Connectivity (1 paper)Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Peter Weber
9 papers receiving 138 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Psychiatry and Mental health 67
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 53
- Neurology 30
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 35
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 27
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Weber
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Weber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Weber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Weber. The network helps show where Peter Weber may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Peter Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 19 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 40 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 10 | |
| 9 | 1993 | 33 | |
| 10 | [Teratogenicity of retinoids. A case and review of the literature]. | 1993 | 3 |
| 11 | 1991 | 22 |
About Peter Weber
Peter Weber is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Neurology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 146 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (2 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (2 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (2 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (2 papers), Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy (2 papers), Hallucinations in medical conditions (1 paper) and Engineering Applied Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (67 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (53 citations), Neurology (30 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (35 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (27 citations). Peter Weber has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include E. François Aldrich, Wayne N. Crow, Jürg Lütschg, Ritu Kapur, Richard S. Zimmerman, Martha J. Morrell, Madjid Samii, Ryder P. Gwinn, Donald P. Becker and R. Favre. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Paediatrica, Journal of neurosurgery, Neuropediatrics, Brain Connectivity and Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.