Peter Sudhölter

1.5k citations
56 papers · 823 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Sudhölter

44 papers receiving 789 citations

Peers

Peter Sudhölter
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Management Science and Operations Research 549
  • Economics and Econometrics 622
  • General Decision Sciences 14
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 93
  • Transportation 35
Replace Dinko Dimitrov with:
Dinko Dimitrov Germany
Anne van den Nouweland United States
Robert P. Gilles United States
Gustavo Bergantiños Spain
Jos Potters Netherlands
José M. Zarzuelo Spain
Imma Curiel Netherlands
A. M. Mármol Spain
Gerard van der Laan Netherlands
J.M. Bilbao Spain
Peter Sudhölter relative to Dinko Dimitrov Germany Dinko Dimitrov's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Dinko Dimitrov · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Sudhölter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Sudhölter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Sudhölter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Sudhölter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Sudhölter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Sudhölter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Sudhölter. The network helps show where Peter Sudhölter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Peter Sudhölter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Sudhölter Line = papers co-authored together Peter Sudhölter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007321
2 2003176
3 200138
4 199937
5 199822
6 199722
7 199618
8 200915
9 200712
10 200112
11 200011
12 201211
13 19948
14 19998
15 20168
16 20128
17 19987
18 20036
19 20096
20 20025

About Peter Sudhölter

Peter Sudhölter is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Safety Research, having authored 56 papers that have together received 823 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Game Theory and Voting Systems (47 papers), Game Theory and Applications (34 papers), Auction Theory and Applications (26 papers), Economic theories and models (13 papers), Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (8 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (7 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers) and Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (549 citations), Economics and Econometrics (622 citations), General Decision Sciences (14 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (93 citations) and Transportation (35 citations). Peter Sudhölter has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Germany and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Bezalel Peleg, Jos Potters, Joachim Rosenmüller, Michel Grabisch, José M. Zarzuelo, Michel Le Breton, T. E. S. Raghavan, Ron Holzman, Hans Peters and Hans Reijnierse. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Game Theory, Mathematical Social Sciences, Mathematics of Operations Research, Games and Economic Behavior and Social Choice and Welfare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact