Peter Stringer
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Geophysics top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Building and Construction top 10%
- Co-authors
- Philip L. PearceJ. E. TreagusD. BannisterFathali M. MoghaddamN. RastL. R. FyffeRon K. PickerillChris Lucas
- Topics
- Geological formations and processes (8 papers)Geological and Geochemical Analysis (6 papers)Geological Studies and Exploration (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
Peter Stringer
60 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
- Sociology and Political Science 392
- Social Psychology 237
- Geophysics 209
- Artificial Intelligence 89
- Building and Construction 89
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Stringer
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Stringer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Stringer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Stringer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Stringer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Stringer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Stringer. The network helps show where Peter Stringer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Stringer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Stringer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Stringer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Stringer. Peter Stringer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55 | |
| 2 | 47 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 74 | |
| 6 | 93 | |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | The Myths of Architectural Creativity | 5 |
| 16 | Recent Advances and the Interpretation of Geological Structure of New Brunswick | 18 |
| 17 | Attitudes and information in public participation: A case-study | 2 |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Peter Stringer
Peter Stringer is a scholar working on Architecture, Earth-Surface Processes and Geology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological formations and processes (8 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (6 papers) and Geological Studies and Exploration (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (29 citations), Geophysics (209 citations) and General Psychology (17 citations). Peter Stringer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Philip L. Pearce, J. E. Treagus, D. Bannister, Fathali M. Moghaddam, N. Rast, L. R. Fyffe, Ron K. Pickerill, Chris Lucas, David Canter and Margaret Wetherell. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Tectonophysics and Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.