Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Fast folding and comparison of RNA secondary structures
19941.7k citationsWalter Fontana, Peter F. Stadler et al.profile →
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schuster
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schuster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schuster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schuster more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schuster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schuster. The network helps show where Peter Schuster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Schuster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Schuster.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Schuster based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Schuster. Peter Schuster is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Müller, Stefan C., Josef Hofbauer, Lukas Endler, et al.. (2006). A generalized model of the repressilator. Journal of Mathematical Biology. 53(6). 905–937.68 indexed citations
7.
Schuster, Peter. (2004). The disaster of central control: Simply Complex - An impressive example from nature. Complexity. 9(4). 13–14.2 indexed citations
8.
Crutchfield, James P. & Peter Schuster. (2003). Evolutionary dynamics : exploring the interplay of selection, accident, neutrality, and function. Oxford University Press eBooks.83 indexed citations
9.
Schuster, Peter, et al.. (2003). Freundschaft und Verwandtschaft als Gegenstand interdisziplinärer Forschung. Einleitung zum Themenschwerpunkt. PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University).2 indexed citations
10.
Edelstein, Wolfgang, Fritz Oser, & Peter Schuster. (2001). Moralische Erziehung in der Schule: Entwicklungspsychologie und pädagogische Praxis. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics.2 indexed citations
11.
Schuster, Peter. (2000). Eine Stadt vor Gericht : Recht und Alltag im spätmittelalterlichen Konstanz. PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University).4 indexed citations
12.
Schuster, Peter. (1999). Die Krise des Spätmittelalters : Zur Evidenz eines sozial- und wirtschaftsgeschichtlichen Paradigmas in der Geschichtsschreibung des 20. Jahrhunderts. Historische Zeitschrift. 269(1).2 indexed citations
Schuster, Peter. (1995). Der gelobte Frieden : Täter, Opfer und Herrschaft im spätmittelalterlichen Konstanz. PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University).1 indexed citations
15.
Fontana, Walter, Danielle Konings, Peter F. Stadler, & Peter Schuster. (1993). Statistics of RNA secondary structures. Biopolymers. 33(9). 1389–1404.223 indexed citations
Eigen, Manfred & Peter Schuster. (1977). A principle of natural self-organization. Die Naturwissenschaften. 64(11). 541–565.1172 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Schuster, Peter, et al.. (1975). Structure of liquids. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.