Peter Schrenk
- Cancer Research top 0.5%
- Breast Cancer Treatment Studies 42
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas 25
- Surgery top 2%
- Breast Implant and Reconstruction 29
- Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments 7
- Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques 5
- Oncology top 5%
- Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment 7
- Emergency Medicine top 5%
- Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management 7
-
- Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders 10
Peter Schrenk
73 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Cancer Research 1.9k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.4k
- Surgery 1.8k
- Oncology 897
- Emergency Medicine 166
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Schrenk
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Schrenk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Schrenk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Schrenk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Schrenk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Schrenk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Schrenk. The network helps show where Peter Schrenk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Schrenk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 59 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 49 | |
| 4 | Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy in patients with breast cancer before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SENTINA): a prospective, multicentre cohort studybreakdown → | 2013 | 928 |
| 5 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 24 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 56 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 11 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 23 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 425 | |
| 16 | 1999 | 34 | |
| 17 | 1998 | 54 | |
| 18 | 1994 | 12 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 24 | |
| 20 | [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy--advantages and disadvantages]. | 1993 | 3 |
About Peter Schrenk
Peter Schrenk is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Internal Medicine and Emergency Medicine, having authored 78 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (42 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (29 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (25 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (10 papers), Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (7 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (7 papers) and Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (1.9k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.4k citations), Surgery (1.8k citations), Oncology (897 citations) and Emergency Medicine (166 citations). Peter Schrenk has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include W. Wayand, Andreas Shamiyeh, Roman Rieger, R. Woisetschläger, Tanja Fehm, Barbara Fleige, Michael Untch, Valentina Nekljudova, G Helms and Gϋnter von Minckwitz. Their work appears in journals such as Surgical Endoscopy, Dermatologic Surgery, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Surgical Oncology and European Journal of Surgical Oncology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.