Peter S. Kaplan

1.4k citations
45 papers · 1.0k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Peter S. Kaplan

43 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Peter S. Kaplan
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Pharmacy 229
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 437
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 368
  • Developmental Biology 39
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 194
Replace Gordon W. Bronson with:
Gordon W. Bronson United States
Janet E. Frick United States
Fabio Apicella Italy
Greg D. Reynolds United States
Nóra Bunford Hungary
Ágnes Volein United Kingdom
Victoria Leong United Kingdom
Elinor W. Ames Canada
Jeffrey W. Fagen United States
Ann Phillips United States
Peter S. Kaplan relative to Gordon W. Bronson United States Gordon W. Bronson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gordon W. Bronson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter S. Kaplan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter S. Kaplan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter S. Kaplan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter S. Kaplan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter S. Kaplan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter S. Kaplan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter S. Kaplan. The network helps show where Peter S. Kaplan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Peter S. Kaplan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter S. Kaplan Line = papers co-authored together Peter S. Kaplan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200279
2 199576
3 199976
4 198468
5 198264
6 198657
7 199652
8 200145
9 201441
10 199338
11 199536
12 201335
13 199534
14 200731
15 199125
16 200423
17 200922
18 201021
19 201520
20 198718

About Peter S. Kaplan

Peter S. Kaplan is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Pharmacy, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infant Health and Development (12 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (11 papers), Language Development and Disorders (9 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (7 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (7 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (7 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (229 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (437 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (368 citations), Developmental Biology (39 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (194 citations). Peter S. Kaplan has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John S. Werner, Jo‐Anne Bachorowski, David H. Peterzell, Eliot Hearst, Moria J. Smoski, Michael C. Zinser, Christina M. Danko, Robin Panneton Cooper, Aaron Burgess and Michael H. Goldstein. Their work appears in journals such as Infant Behavior and Development, Developmental Psychobiology, Developmental Psychology, Infancy and Chemical Senses.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact