Peter Rudiak‐Gould
- Demography top 5%
- Island Studies and Pacific Affairs 7
-
- Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies 3
-
- Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration 8
- Climate Change Communication and Perception 5
- Risk Perception and Management 3
- Disaster Management and Resilience 2
-
- Environmental Education and Sustainability 2
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Climate Change and Geoengineering 2
- Co-authors
- Tony Crook
- Journals
- Global Environmental Change (2 papers)Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (1 paper)Current Anthropology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Peter Rudiak‐Gould
16 papers receiving 397 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Demography 144
- Geography, Planning and Development 61
- Sociology and Political Science 357
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 63
- Global and Planetary Change 109
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Rudiak‐Gould
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Rudiak‐Gould's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Rudiak‐Gould with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Rudiak‐Gould more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Rudiak‐Gould
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Rudiak‐Gould. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Rudiak‐Gould. The network helps show where Peter Rudiak‐Gould may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Peter Rudiak‐Gould, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pacific Climate Cultures | 2019 | 1 |
| 2 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 43 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 76 | |
| 7 | Climate Change and Tradition in a Small Island State: The Rising Tide | 2013 | 28 |
| 8 | 2013 | 49 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 38 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 91 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 42 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 16 | Surviving Paradise: One Year on a Disappearing Island | 2009 | 6 |
About Peter Rudiak‐Gould
Peter Rudiak‐Gould is a scholar working on Demography, Geography, Planning and Development and General Social Sciences, having authored 16 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration (8 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (7 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (5 papers), Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (3 papers), Risk Perception and Management (3 papers), Climate Change and Geoengineering (2 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (2 papers) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (144 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (61 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (357 citations). Peter Rudiak‐Gould has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tony Crook. Their work appears in journals such as Global Environmental Change, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society and Current Anthropology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.