Peter Quax

1.3k citations
77 papers · 851 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Quax

75 papers receiving 816 citations

Peers

Peter Quax
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Computer Networks and Communications 379
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 258
  • Signal Processing 129
  • Human-Computer Interaction 64
  • Hardware and Architecture 60
Replace Wim Lamotte with:
Wim Lamotte Belgium
Oriana Riva United States
Volker Hilt Germany
Kuan‐Ta Chen Taiwan
Aaron Carroll Australia
Valerio Bellandi Italy
Martı́n Varela Finland
David T. Nguyen United States
Justin Cappos United States
Reuben Edwards United Kingdom
Peter Quax relative to Wim Lamotte Belgium Wim Lamotte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Wim Lamotte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Quax

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Quax's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Quax with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Quax more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Quax

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Quax. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Quax. The network helps show where Peter Quax may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Peter Quax, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Quax Line = papers co-authored together Peter Quax links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 77 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004100
2 201795
3 201875
4 201371
5 202045
6 201729
7 201828
8 201325
9 201122
10 200322
11 201818
12
Personal Information Leakage by Abusing the {GDPR} 'Right of Access'
201914
13 201414
14 201214
15 201813
16 201911
17 201811
18 201510
19 200610
20 201810

About Peter Quax

Peter Quax is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Sociology and Political Science, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing, having authored 77 papers that have together received 851 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multimedia Communication and Technology (25 papers), Image and Video Quality Assessment (20 papers), Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies (16 papers), Video Coding and Compression Technologies (11 papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (11 papers), Network Traffic and Congestion Control (8 papers), Opportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks (8 papers) and Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Networks and Communications (379 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (258 citations), Signal Processing (129 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (64 citations) and Hardware and Architecture (60 citations). Peter Quax has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Wim Lamotte, Pieter Robyns, Danny De Vleeschauwer, Eduard Marin, Dave Singelée, Bart Preneel, Karin Coninx, Gustavo Rovelo Ruiz, Jori Liesenborgs and Kris Luyten. Their work appears in journals such as Multimedia Tools and Applications, IACR Transactions on Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems, Security and Communication Networks, Information and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact