Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A privacy threat analysis framework: supporting the elicitation and fulfillment of privacy requirements
2010308 citationsMina Deng, Bart Preneel et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Bart Preneel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bart Preneel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bart Preneel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bart Preneel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bart Preneel. The network helps show where Bart Preneel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bart Preneel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bart Preneel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bart Preneel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Bart Preneel. Bart Preneel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ottoy, Geoffrey, et al.. (2013). Open-source hardware for embedded security. Lirias (KU Leuven).
7.
Andreeva, Elena, et al.. (2012). Security Analysis and Comparison of the SHA-3 Finalists BLAKE, Grøstl, JH, Keccak, and Skein. Lecture notes in computer science. 7374. 287–305.1 indexed citations
8.
Singelée, Dave, Benoît Latré, Bart Braem, et al.. (2010). A secure low-delay protocol for wireless body area networks. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).7 indexed citations
Singelée, Dave & Bart Preneel. (2007). Enabling Location Privacy in Wireless Personal Area Networks. Lirias (KU Leuven).2 indexed citations
13.
Batina, Lejla, D. Hwang, A. Hodjat, Bart Preneel, & Ingrid Verbauwhede. (2005). Hardware/Software Co-design for Hyperelliptic Curve Cryptography (HECC) on the 8051 microprocessor. Lirias (KU Leuven).4 indexed citations
14.
Singelée, Dave & Bart Preneel. (2005). The Wireless Application Protocol. International journal of network security. 1(3). 161–165.13 indexed citations
Batina, Lejla, Nele Mentens, Berna Örs, et al.. (2004). Side channel attacks and fault attacks on cryptographic algorithms. Lirias (KU Leuven).2 indexed citations
18.
Paul, Souradyuti & Bart Preneel. (2004). A new weakness in the RC4 keystream generator and an approach to improve the security of the Cipher. Lecture notes in computer science. 3017. 245–259.6 indexed citations
19.
Biryukov, Alex, Christophe De Cannière, An Braeken, & Bart Preneel. (2003). A Toolbox for Cryptanalysis: Linear and Affine Equivalence Algorithms. Lecture notes in computer science. 2656. 33–50.10 indexed citations
20.
Preneel, Bart, René Govaerts, & Joos Vandewalle. (1993). Hash Functions Based on Block Ciphers: A Synthetic Approach. Lecture notes in computer science. 773. 368–378.110 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.