Peter Neyroud

1.5k citations
60 papers · 771 indexed · h-index 14

Peter Neyroud

54 papers receiving 685 citations

Peers

Peter Neyroud
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Political Science and International Relations 431
  • Sociology and Political Science 644
  • Health 122
  • Public Administration 19
  • Gender Studies 44
Replace Ling Ren with:
Ling Ren United States
Karen Bullock United Kingdom
William V. Pelfrey United States
P. A. J. Waddington United Kingdom
Kathleen J. Frydl United States
Gary W. Cordner United States
Andrew L. Giacomazzi United States
Kim Michelle Lersch United States
Charles F. Klahm United States
Maarten Van Craen Belgium
Peter Neyroud relative to Ling Ren United States Ling Ren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Ling Ren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Neyroud

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Neyroud's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Neyroud with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Neyroud more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Neyroud

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Neyroud. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Neyroud. The network helps show where Peter Neyroud may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Neyroud, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Neyroud Line = papers co-authored together Peter Neyroud links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20241
3 20232
4 20236
5 20236
6 202166
7 202115
8 202114
9 202018
10 201823
11
Policing with science: a new evidence-based professionalism for policing?
20170
12
From the Editors: European Police Science And Evidence-Based Policing
20151
13 201514
14 201313
15 20128
16 20108
17
Effective Prosecution: Working In Partnership with the CPS
20093
18 200826
19 20081
20 20072

About Peter Neyroud

Peter Neyroud is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Law, Health and Public Administration, having authored 60 papers that have together received 771 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (33 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (28 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (16 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (7 papers), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (3 papers), Regulation and Compliance Studies (3 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (3 papers) and Criminal Law and Evidence (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (431 citations), Sociology and Political Science (644 citations), Health (122 citations), Public Administration (19 citations) and Gender Studies (44 citations). Peter Neyroud has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence W. Sherman, Alan Beckley, Sanja Kutnjak Ivković, Jon Maskály, David Weisburd, Emma Disley, Tim Newburn, Molly Slothower, Jacqueline Hodgson and Ivan Y. Sun. Their work appears in journals such as Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice, International Criminal Justice Review, Police Practice and Research, Criminology & Public Policy and Criminal Justice Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026