Peter Nabokov
- Anthropology top 5%
- Paleontology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Health
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Francis JenningsRobert C. PenningtonDonald BahrRobert H. KellerVine DeloriaDell UptonJ. DavisJoseph C. Porter
- Topics
- Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (2 papers)Asian American and Pacific Histories (1 paper)American Environmental and Regional History (1 paper)
- Cited by
- ArcheologyPaleontologyAnthropology
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Peter Nabokov
17 papers receiving 220 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Anthropology 103
- Paleontology 81
- Sociology and Political Science 73
- Health 42
- General Health Professions 42
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Nabokov
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Nabokov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Nabokov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Nabokov more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Nabokov
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Nabokov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Nabokov. The network helps show where Peter Nabokov may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Nabokov
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Nabokov. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Nabokov based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Nabokov. Peter Nabokov is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Origin Myth of Acoma Pueblo | 2 |
| 2 | 32 | |
| 3 | Where the Lightning Strikes: The Lives of American Indian Sacred Places | 16 |
| 4 | A Forest of Time: American Indian Ways of History | 48 |
| 5 | Native American testimony : a chronicle of Indian-white relations from prophecy to the present, 1492-2000 | 15 |
| 6 | 39 | |
| 7 | The Native Americans: An Illustrated History | 1 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | A study of Pueblo architecture in Tusayan and Cibola | 7 |
| 12 | 35 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 44 | |
| 15 | Architecture of Acoma Pueblo the 1934 Historic American Buildings Survey Project | 6 |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Implementing an Indigenous Community Education Program: A Final Report. | 1 |
| 19 | Tijerina and the courthouse raid | 19 |
| 20 | 29 |
About Peter Nabokov
Peter Nabokov is a scholar working on Health, Anthropology and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 21 papers that have together received 321 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (2 papers), Asian American and Pacific Histories (1 paper) and American Environmental and Regional History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (32 citations), Paleontology (81 citations) and Anthropology (103 citations). Peter Nabokov has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Francis Jennings, Robert C. Pennington, Donald Bahr, Robert H. Keller, Vine Deloria, Dell Upton, J. Davis and Joseph C. Porter. Their work appears in journals such as Technology and Culture, Ethnohistory and Journal of American Folklore.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.