Peter Moutoglis
Impact in
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
- Plant Science top 0.5%
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance
Papers in
-
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 9
-
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 20
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity 2
- Plant Parasitism and Resistance 2
Peter Moutoglis
20 papers receiving 3.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Insect Science 1.1k
- Plant Science 3.2k
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 902
- Soil Science 565
- Pharmacology 734
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Moutoglis
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Moutoglis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Moutoglis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Moutoglis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Moutoglis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Moutoglis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Moutoglis. The network helps show where Peter Moutoglis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Moutoglis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 22 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 63 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2005 | 8 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 102 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 28 | |
| 9 | Methods of studying soil microbial diversity Hit paper breakdown → | 2004 | 568 |
| 10 | 2004 | 71 | |
| 11 | 2002 | 138 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 72 | |
| 13 | 2001 | 36 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 34 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 62 | |
| 16 | Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity Hit paper breakdown → | 1998 | 2589 |
| 17 | 1996 | 12 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1993 | 99 |
About Peter Moutoglis
Peter Moutoglis is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Pharmacology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (20 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (9 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (3 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (2 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (1.1k citations), Plant Science (3.2k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (902 citations), Soil Science (565 citations) and Pharmacology (734 citations). Peter Moutoglis has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Austria and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include John N. Klironomos, Marcel G. A. van der Heijden, Thomas Böller, Ruth Streitwolf‐Engel, Andres Wiemken, Ian R. Sanders, Miranda M. Hart, J. T. Trevors, Jennifer L. Kirk and Hung Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Remediation Journal, Mycorrhiza, Mycologia, BioScience and Pedobiologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.