Countries citing papers authored by Peter Marshall
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Marshall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Marshall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Marshall more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Marshall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Marshall. The network helps show where Peter Marshall may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Marshall
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Marshall.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Marshall based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Marshall. Peter Marshall is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bayliss, Alex, Christopher Bronk Ramsey, Gordon Cook, et al.. (2016). Radiocarbon Dates: from samples funded by English Heritage between 1998 and 2003. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).7 indexed citations
7.
Marshall, Peter, et al.. (2013). Social CRM: A review of academic and practitioner literatures and research agendas. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).9 indexed citations
8.
McKay, Judy, et al.. (2010). Artefaction as Communication: Redesigning Communication Models. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
9.
McKay, Judy, et al.. (2010). The Roles and Practices of Business Analysts: A Boundary Practice Perspective. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).7 indexed citations
10.
Campbell, Cam & Peter Marshall. (2010). Mapping Exposure to Avalanche Terrain. 556–560.9 indexed citations
McKay, Judy & Peter Marshall. (2005). A Review of Design Science in Information Systems. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).38 indexed citations
13.
Marshall, Peter, et al.. (2004). A Process Model of Business Value Creation from IT Investments. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.3 indexed citations
14.
McKay, Judy & Peter Marshall. (2004). Strategic Management of E-Business. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).38 indexed citations
15.
McKay, Judith, et al.. (2004). Exploring the perceptions of inhibitors and drivers of e-business progression among SMEs at different stages of e-business maturity.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1–12.11 indexed citations
16.
McKay, Judith & Peter Marshall. (2001). Shaping a Process Model for Action Research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 37.2 indexed citations
17.
Douglas, A., et al.. (2001). The yields of the Indian nuclear tests of 1998 and their relevance to Test Ban verification.. Current Science. 81(1). 72–74.3 indexed citations
18.
McKay, Judith, et al.. (2000). Stages of Maturity for E-Business: The SOG-e Model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.25 indexed citations
19.
McKay, Judy, et al.. (2000). E-business maturity: the SOG-e model. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology).45 indexed citations
20.
Marshall, Peter, et al.. (1985). Body wave magnitudes and locations of French underground explosions at the Mururoa test site. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 87. 22947.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.