Peter M. Goodwin
Impact in
- Biophysics top 0.1%
- Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
- Structural Biology top 2%
Papers in
- Biophysics 38
- Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques 36
- Co-authors
- Richard A. KellerW. Patrick AmbroseJohn C. MartinJames H. WernerJames H. JettAlan Van OrdenJeffrey T. PettyCharles E. Otis
- Journals
- Analytical Chemistry (9 papers)The Journal of Physical Chemistry C (7 papers)The Journal of Chemical Physics (7 papers)Applied Physics Letters (6 papers)Journal of Applied Physics (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter M. Goodwin
119 papers receiving 3.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Biophysics 1.1k
- Structural Biology 94
- Biomedical Engineering 1.4k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 578
- Materials Chemistry 1.3k
Countries citing papers authored by Peter M. Goodwin
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter M. Goodwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter M. Goodwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter M. Goodwin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter M. Goodwin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter M. Goodwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter M. Goodwin. The network helps show where Peter M. Goodwin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter M. Goodwin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 33 | |
| 6 | Hydrodynamic Simulations of Gaseous Argon Shock Experiments | 2015 | 1 |
| 7 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 99 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 97 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 61 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 34 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 10 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1993 | 110 | |
| 20 | 1991 | 9 |
About Peter M. Goodwin
Peter M. Goodwin is a scholar working on Biophysics, Structural Biology, Acoustics and Ultrasonics, Biomedical Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 123 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (36 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (27 papers), Near-Field Optical Microscopy (17 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (12 papers), Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications (10 papers), Gold and Silver Nanoparticles Synthesis and Applications (10 papers), Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications (10 papers) and Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (1.1k citations), Structural Biology (94 citations), Biomedical Engineering (1.4k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (578 citations) and Materials Chemistry (1.3k citations). Peter M. Goodwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Richard A. Keller, W. Patrick Ambrose, John C. Martin, James H. Werner, James H. Jett, Alan Van Orden, Jeffrey T. Petty, Charles E. Otis, Ming Wu and Guillaume A. Lessard. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Chemistry, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Applied Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.