Peter Ludé

19 papers receiving 867 citations

Peers

Peter Ludé
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 564
  • Rehabilitation 132
  • Clinical Psychology 396
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 237
  • Applied Psychology 49
Replace Christel M. C. van Leeuwen with:
Christel M. C. van Leeuwen Netherlands
Kathryn Boschen Canada
Christine Migliorini Australia
Jennifer Coker United States
Robert L. Umlauf United States
Jo Ann Brockway United States
Judith Gargaro Canada
Kimberley R. Monden United States
Carly Brooks United States
Inga-Britt Bränholm Sweden
Peter Ludé relative to Christel M. C. van Leeuwen Netherlands Christel M. C. van Leeuwen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Christel M. C. van Leeuwen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Ludé

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Ludé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Ludé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Ludé more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Ludé

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Ludé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Ludé. The network helps show where Peter Ludé may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Peter Ludé, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Ludé Line = papers co-authored together Peter Ludé links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012287
2 2005206
3 201259
4 201447
5 201047
6 201147
7 200944
8 201141
9 201327
10 200627
11 200426
12 20029
13 20217
14 20215
15 20213
16 20162
17 20101
18 20161
19 20021
20 19970

About Peter Ludé

Peter Ludé is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions, having authored 21 papers that have together received 887 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (12 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (6 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (3 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (3 papers), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (3 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (564 citations), Rehabilitation (132 citations), Clinical Psychology (396 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (237 citations) and Applied Psychology (49 citations). Peter Ludé has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Paul Kennedy, Magnus L. Elfström, Nik Taylor, George A. Bonanno, Isaac R. Galatzer‐Levy, Emilie F. Smithson, C Ballert, Claudio Peter, Szilvia Geyh and Elizabeth A. Nick. Their work appears in journals such as Spinal Cord, Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal and Rehabilitation Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact