Peter Lipton

42 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

Inference to the Best Explanation 2003 · 969 citations
9690+7+15Years since publication250500750

Peers

Peter Lipton
Comparison fields: 5 of 156
  • History and Philosophy of Science 954
  • Philosophy 675
  • General Decision Sciences 57
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 310
  • General Psychology 20
Replace John Worrall with:
John Worrall United States
Peter Achinstein United States
James Woodward United States
Michael D. Resnik United States
Karl Popper United Kingdom
Michael Strevens United States
William Demopoulos Canada
James Ladyman United Kingdom
Charles S. Peirce United States
Lindley Darden United States
Peter Lipton relative to John Worrall United States John Worrall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
John Worrall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Lipton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Lipton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Lipton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Lipton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Lipton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Lipton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Lipton. The network helps show where Peter Lipton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Lipton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Lipton Line = papers co-authored together Peter Lipton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Inference to the Best Explanation
Hit paper breakdown →
2003969
2 1993222
3 1990144
4 199886
5 200575
6 199669
7 199355
8
IS THE BEST GOOD ENOUGH
199353
9 199946
10 199335
11 200334
12 199330
13 200429
14 200725
15 199123
16 199121
17
Tracking Track Records
200020
18 200420
19 200520
20 198918

About Peter Lipton

Peter Lipton is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Molecular Biology and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 46 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (23 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (13 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers), Science and Climate Studies (5 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (4 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers) and Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (954 citations), Philosophy (675 citations), General Decision Sciences (57 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (310 citations) and General Psychology (20 citations). Peter Lipton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Peter Milne, Hilary� Kornblith, Paul Hoyningen‐Huene, Jonathan Vogel, John Worrall, Edward Stein, Martin Kusch, Helen M. Wallace, Mark A. Rothstein and Klaus Lindpaintner. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Analysis and Philosophy of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact