Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Expression and Meaning.
1982611 citationsPeter Lamarque, John R. SearleThe Philosophical Quarterlyprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Lamarque
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Lamarque's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Lamarque with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Lamarque more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Lamarque. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Lamarque. The network helps show where Peter Lamarque may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Lamarque
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Lamarque.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Lamarque based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Lamarque. Peter Lamarque is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lamarque, Peter. (2010). Work and Object: Explorations in the Metaphysics of Art. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).8 indexed citations
Lamarque, Peter & Stein Haugom Olsen. (2004). Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art: The Analytic Tradition: An Anthology. Blackwell eBooks.17 indexed citations
10.
Lamarque, Peter. (1999). Arguing About Art. European Journal of Philosophy. 7(1). 89–100.4 indexed citations
11.
Lamarque, Peter & R. E. Asher. (1997). Concise encyclopedia of philosophy of language. Pergamon eBooks.10 indexed citations
12.
Cooper, David E., Peter Lamarque, & Crispin Sartwell. (1997). Aesthetics: The Classic Readings. 40(4). 764–72.17 indexed citations
13.
Lamarque, Peter & Stein Haugom Olsen. (1996). Truth, Fiction, and Literature. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)).62 indexed citations
Lamarque, Peter. (1984). Philosophical Theories of Metaphor. Terrestrial Environment Research Center (University of Tsukuba). 10.
18.
Lamarque, Peter. (1983). Philosophy and Fiction: Essays in Literary Aesthetics. Medical Entomology and Zoology.6 indexed citations
19.
Lamarque, Peter. (1982). John Searle, "Expression and Meaning". The Philosophical Quarterly. 32(127).8 indexed citations
20.
Lamarque, Peter & John R. Searle. (1982). Expression and Meaning.. The Philosophical Quarterly. 32(127). 177–177.611 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.