Peter L. Ormosi

402 citations
39 papers · 230 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Peter L. Ormosi

35 papers receiving 206 citations

Peers

Peter L. Ormosi
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Marketing 57
  • Economics and Econometrics 155
  • Accounting 59
  • Strategy and Management 70
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 23
Replace Kei Kawai with:
Kei Kawai United States
Laurent Linnemer France
Robert Pitofsky United States
Thien Sang Lim Malaysia
Phillip Areeda United States
Marian Socoliuc Romania
Kineung Choo South Korea
Mahfoudh Hussein Mgammal Saudi Arabia
Wioletta Dziuda United States
Loreta Valančienė Lithuania
Peter L. Ormosi relative to Kei Kawai United States Kei Kawai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.0×
Kei Kawai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter L. Ormosi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter L. Ormosi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter L. Ormosi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter L. Ormosi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter L. Ormosi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter L. Ormosi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter L. Ormosi. The network helps show where Peter L. Ormosi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Peter L. Ormosi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter L. Ormosi Line = papers co-authored together Peter L. Ormosi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201327
2 201823
3 202023
4 201016
5 201215
6 202111
7 20168
8 20158
9 20208
10 20167
11 20236
12 20126
13 20186
14
Music streaming: Is it a level playing field?
20216
15 20235
16 20125
17 20144
18 20114
19 20224
20 20144

About Peter L. Ormosi

Peter L. Ormosi is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Accounting, Strategy and Management, Marketing and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 39 papers that have together received 230 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Merger and Competition Analysis (21 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (12 papers), Digital Platforms and Economics (10 papers), Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (8 papers), Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (7 papers), Global trade and economics (5 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (3 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (57 citations), Economics and Econometrics (155 citations), Accounting (59 citations), Strategy and Management (70 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (23 citations). Peter L. Ormosi has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Stephen W. Davies, Konstantinos Chalvatzis, Stephen Davies, Iwan Bos, Joseph E. Harrington, Rahul Savani, Ivan Diaz‐Rainey, John K. Ashton, Rajesh Sharma and Séan Ennis. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Industrial Organization, Journal of Competition Law & Economics, Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money, Journal of Sustainable Tourism and World Competition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact