Peter King

62.1k total citations
104 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Peter King is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter King has authored 104 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 19 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 15 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Peter King's work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (18 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers) and Colonialism, slavery, and trade (8 papers). Peter King is often cited by papers focused on Historical Economic and Social Studies (18 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers) and Colonialism, slavery, and trade (8 papers). Peter King collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Peter King's co-authors include James Mallet, Martyn Poliakoff, B. Willke, R. L. Savage, Chris D. Jiggins, W. Owen McMillan, Robert L. Byer, Josephine M. Pemberton, David Bancroft and David G. Heckel and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Conservation Biology and Optics Letters.

In The Last Decade

Peter King

93 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Peter King
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 344
  • Economics and Econometrics 260
  • Sociology and Political Science 251
  • Genetics 225
  • History 195
Replace Joaquim Fort with:
Joaquim Fort Spain
Alan R. H. Baker United States
Margaret C. Nelson United States
Patrick Roberts Germany
Walter Johnson United States
John Edward Gray United States
Robert Pool United States
Charles A. Bishop United States
David Turnbull Australia
John Russo Italy
Joaquim Fort Spain View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Peter King
Peter King · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Peter King
Peter King · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Peter King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter King. The network helps show where Peter King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter King. Peter King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 2
2 17
3 125
4 1
5 1
6 16
7 14
8 4
9 54
10 11
11 77
12 15
13 7
14 15
15 11
16 17
17 6
18
Utilitarian jurisprudence in America : the influence of Bentham and Austin on American legal thought in the nineteenth century
4
19
DAVID E. STANNARD. — The Puritan Way of Death: A Study in Religion, Culture and Social Change.
1
20 17

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026