Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Detection of 15 dB Squeezed States of Light and their Application for the Absolute Calibration of Photoelectric Quantum Efficiency
2016536 citationsH. Vahlbruch, M. Mehmet et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of K. Danzmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K. Danzmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K. Danzmann more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K. Danzmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K. Danzmann. The network helps show where K. Danzmann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of K. Danzmann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K. Danzmann.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K. Danzmann based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with K. Danzmann. K. Danzmann is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Danzmann, K., Oliver Gerberding, Daniel Schütze, et al.. (2017). Laser ranging interferometer for GRACE follow-on. ANU Open Research (Australian National University). 84–84.10 indexed citations
6.
Gerberding, Oliver, et al.. (2016). Laser frequency stabilisation via quasi-monolithic, unequal arm-length Mach-Zehnder interferometer with balanced DC readout. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
Steier, Frank, et al.. (2008). Subtraction of test mass angular noise in the LISA technology package interferometer. Max Planck Digital Library.9 indexed citations
Marín, A F García, Vinzenz Wand, Frank Steier, et al.. (2006). On-orbit alignment and diagnostics for the LISA Technology Package. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society).2 indexed citations
15.
Racca, G D, et al.. (2004). Gravitational waves and massive black holes? The LISA and LISA pathfinder missions. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society). 119(119). 5–13.1 indexed citations
16.
Frede, M., René Wilhelm, Carsten Fallnich, B. Willke, & K. Danzmann. (2004). 213 W linearly polarized fundamental mode Nd:YAG ring laser. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics. 2. 1001–1002.1 indexed citations
17.
Freitag, I., et al.. (1995). Diode-pumped solid-state lasers as light sources of Michelson-type graviational wave detectors. Applied Physics B. 60.1 indexed citations
18.
Fee, Michale S., Steven Chu, A. P. Mills, et al.. (1993). Measurement of the positronium 1 3 S 1 -2 3 S 1 interval by continuous-wave two-photon excitation. MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society).2 indexed citations
Danzmann, K.. (1992). Laser Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detectors. General Relativity and Gravitation. 349–368.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.