Peter Hopkirk
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- History top 10%
- Topics
- Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (4 papers)Philippine History and Culture (2 papers)Chinese history and philosophy (2 papers)
In The Last Decade
Peter Hopkirk
14 papers receiving 184 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Political Science and International Relations 154
- Sociology and Political Science 140
- Anthropology 58
- Economics and Econometrics 23
- History 19
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Hopkirk
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Hopkirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Hopkirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Hopkirk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Hopkirk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Hopkirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Hopkirk. The network helps show where Peter Hopkirk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Hopkirk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Hopkirk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Hopkirk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Hopkirk. Peter Hopkirk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peter hopkirk, Wielka gra. Sekretna wojna o azję Środkową, Wydawnictwo Zysk i S-ka, Poznań 2011, s. 718 / Joanna Modrzejewska-Leśniewska. | 1 |
| 2 | Küçük Asya seyahatnamesi : Anadolu'da bir İngiliz subayı, 1876 | 0 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Quest for Kim: In Search of Kipling's Great Game | 8 |
| 5 | Like Hidden Fire: The Plot to Bring Down the British Empire | 11 |
| 6 | On Secret Service East of Constantinople: The Plot to Bring Down the British Empire | 9 |
| 7 | The great game : the struggle for empire in central Asia | 97 |
| 8 | The great game : on secret service in high Asia | 62 |
| 9 | The Great Game | 47 |
| 10 | Setting the East ablaze : on secret service in Bolshevik Asia | 3 |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | Setting the East Ablaze: Lenin's Dream of an Empire in Asia | 14 |
| 13 | Trespassers on the roof of the world : the race for Lhasa | 5 |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | Trespassers on the Roof of the World: The Secret Exploration of Tibet | 1 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | Foreign devils on the Silk Road : the search for the lost cities and treasures of Chinese Central Asia | 24 |
About Peter Hopkirk
Peter Hopkirk is a scholar working on Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations and History, having authored 17 papers that have together received 301 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (4 papers), Philippine History and Culture (2 papers) and Chinese history and philosophy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Energy (10 citations), Political Science and International Relations (154 citations) and Anthropology (58 citations). Frequent co-authors include Owen Lattimore, A. J. B. Humphreys and Frank Leeming. Their work appears in journals such as Geographical Journal, Pacific Affairs and The South African Archaeological Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.