Peter H. Neidig
- Health top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Gender Studies top 1%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- K. Daniel O’LearyRichard E. HeymanHelen S. PanJennifer Langhinrichsen‐RohlingArthur L. CantosJean Giles-SimsAmy Holtzworth‐MunroeHoward J. Markman
- Topics
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence (13 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (10 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyBehavior TherapyJournal of Interpersonal Violence
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Peter H. Neidig
17 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Health 1.2k
- Clinical Psychology 705
- Sociology and Political Science 489
- Gender Studies 403
- Social Psychology 394
Countries citing papers authored by Peter H. Neidig
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter H. Neidig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter H. Neidig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter H. Neidig more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter H. Neidig
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter H. Neidig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter H. Neidig. The network helps show where Peter H. Neidig may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter H. Neidig
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter H. Neidig. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter H. Neidig based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter H. Neidig. Peter H. Neidig is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48 | |
| 2 | 96 | |
| 3 | 126 | |
| 4 | Physical Aggression Couples Treatment. | 22 |
| 5 | 163 | |
| 6 | 45 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | Domestic conflict containment program, phase II:: Parenting | 1 |
| 9 | 65 | |
| 10 | 133 | |
| 11 | 205 | |
| 12 | 163 | |
| 13 | 51 | |
| 14 | 68 | |
| 15 | 91 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 29 |
About Peter H. Neidig
Peter H. Neidig is a scholar working on Health, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (13 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (10 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (1.2k citations), Gender Studies (403 citations) and Clinical Psychology (705 citations). Peter H. Neidig has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include K. Daniel O’Leary, Richard E. Heyman, Helen S. Pan, Jennifer Langhinrichsen‐Rohling, K. Daniel O’Leary, Arthur L. Cantos, Jean Giles-Sims, Amy Holtzworth‐Munroe, Howard J. Markman and Natalie Smutzler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Behavior Therapy and Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.