Peter H. Boeijinga
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- F. H. Lopes da SilvaMenno P. WitterA.H.M. LohmanF.H. Lopes da SilvaCyriel M. A. PennartzJ.P. PijnFernando Lopes da SilvaR. Luthringer
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (13 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceNetherlandsSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Peter H. Boeijinga
35 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.0k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 972
- Molecular Biology 341
- Pharmacology 233
- Psychiatry and Mental health 181
Countries citing papers authored by Peter H. Boeijinga
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter H. Boeijinga's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter H. Boeijinga with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter H. Boeijinga more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter H. Boeijinga
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter H. Boeijinga. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter H. Boeijinga. The network helps show where Peter H. Boeijinga may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter H. Boeijinga
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter H. Boeijinga. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter H. Boeijinga based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter H. Boeijinga. Peter H. Boeijinga is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 87 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 55 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 55 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 60 | |
| 15 | 59 | |
| 16 | 65 | |
| 17 | 67 | |
| 18 | 38 | |
| 19 | 149 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Peter H. Boeijinga
Peter H. Boeijinga is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (13 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Biological Psychiatry (132 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (972 citations). Peter H. Boeijinga has collaborated with scholars based in France, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include F. H. Lopes da Silva, Menno P. Witter, A.H.M. Lohman, F.H. Lopes da Silva, Cyriel M. A. Pennartz, J.P. Pijn, Fernando Lopes da Silva, R. Luthringer, H.W.G.M. Boddeke and Sanjeev Pathak. Their work appears in journals such as Physiological Reviews, Brain Research and Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.