Peter Frank

610 total citations
8 papers, 485 citations indexed

About

Peter Frank is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Frank has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 485 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Organic Chemistry, 3 papers in Materials Chemistry and 2 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. Recurrent topics in Peter Frank's work include Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (4 papers), Polymer Surface Interaction Studies (2 papers) and Block Copolymer Self-Assembly (2 papers). Peter Frank is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (4 papers), Polymer Surface Interaction Studies (2 papers) and Block Copolymer Self-Assembly (2 papers). Peter Frank collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Peter Frank's co-authors include Erik B. Berda, Alka Prasher, Bryan T. Tuten, Christopher K. Lyon, Ashley M. Hanlon, C. A. Tooley, J. Sherman Bleakney, Danming Chao, Peter Young and Parvez Moondi and has published in prestigious journals such as Macromolecular Rapid Communications, Journal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer Chemistry and Polymer Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Peter Frank

7 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Peter Frank United States	7	312	160	110	96	80	8	485
Daisuke Sakai Japan	12	108 0.3×	228 1.4×	15 0.1×	114 1.2×	49 0.6×	46	619
Ekaterina A. Ponomarenko Russia	7	266 0.9×	96 0.6×	113 1.0×	91 0.9×	74 0.9×	15	464
Hwa Shik Youn South Korea	11	77 0.2×	205 1.3×	163 1.5×	36 0.4×	25 0.3×	21	590
Rolf Schmidt Canada	13	177 0.6×	101 0.6×	49 0.4×	138 1.4×	98 1.2×	27	480
Matthias Schaub Germany	9	93 0.3×	130 0.8×	48 0.4×	213 2.2×	109 1.4×	11	521
Alison L. Parry United Kingdom	6	194 0.6×	90 0.6×	46 0.4×	111 1.2×	64 0.8×	6	407
Frank Noll Germany	13	47 0.2×	247 1.5×	13 0.1×	128 1.3×	25 0.3×	26	577
Hartmut Kutzke Norway	15	102 0.3×	80 0.5×	52 0.5×	172 1.8×	14 0.2×	40	626
Sandra M. C. Schoenmakers Netherlands	12	242 0.8×	142 0.9×	46 0.4×	308 3.2×	13 0.2×	23	489
George Yiapanis Australia	12	102 0.3×	185 1.2×	62 0.6×	38 0.4×	96 1.2×	23	443

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Frank

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Frank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Frank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Frank more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Frank

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Frank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Frank. The network helps show where Peter Frank may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Frank

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Frank. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Frank based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Frank. Peter Frank is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Neill, Sean, et al.. (2017). OSCE Guide for the ABA Applied Examination. Cambridge University Press eBooks.

2.

Prasher, Alka, et al.. (2015). Efficient fabrication of polymer nanoparticles via sonogashira cross‐linking of linear polymers in dilute solution. Journal of Polymer Science Part A Polymer Chemistry. 54(1). 209–217. 18 indexed citations

3.

Frank, Peter, Alka Prasher, Bryan T. Tuten, Danming Chao, & Erik B. Berda. (2014). Characterization of single-chain polymer folding using size exclusion chromatography with multiple modes of detection. Applied Petrochemical Research. 5(1). 9–17. 16 indexed citations

4.

Lyon, Christopher K., Alka Prasher, Ashley M. Hanlon, et al.. (2014). A brief user's guide to single-chain nanoparticles. Polymer Chemistry. 6(2). 181–197. 249 indexed citations

5.

Frank, Peter, Bryan T. Tuten, Alka Prasher, Danming Chao, & Erik B. Berda. (2013). Intra‐Chain Photodimerization of Pendant Anthracene Units as an Efficient Route to Single‐Chain Nanoparticle Fabrication. Macromolecular Rapid Communications. 35(2). 249–253. 119 indexed citations

6.

Frank, Peter, et al.. (2011). A change in humidification system can eliminate endotracheal tube occlusion. Journal of Critical Care. 26(6). 637.e1–637.e4. 15 indexed citations

7.

Frank, Peter & J. Sherman Bleakney. (1978). Asexual reproduction, diet, and anomalies of the anemone Nematostella vectensis in Nova Scotia. The Canadian Field-Naturalist. 92(3). 259–263. 23 indexed citations

8.

Frank, Peter & J. Sherman Bleakney. (1976). Histology and sexual reproduction of the anemoneNematostella vectensisStephenson 1935. Journal of Natural History. 10(4). 441–449. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact