Peter F. Matthiessen
- Health top 1%
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Co-authors
- Thomas OstermannArndt BüssingGudrun BornhöftAndreas MichalsenUrsula WolfStefanie Maxion‐BergemannE. NeugebauerJulia Fischer
- Topics
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (23 papers)Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (14 papers)Religion and Society Interactions (6 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative PhysiologyBMC Medical Research MethodologyHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter F. Matthiessen
52 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
- Health 550
- Complementary and alternative medicine 387
- Clinical Psychology 304
- Sociology and Political Science 271
- General Health Professions 200
Countries citing papers authored by Peter F. Matthiessen
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter F. Matthiessen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter F. Matthiessen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter F. Matthiessen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter F. Matthiessen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter F. Matthiessen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter F. Matthiessen. The network helps show where Peter F. Matthiessen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter F. Matthiessen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter F. Matthiessen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter F. Matthiessen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter F. Matthiessen. Peter F. Matthiessen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 56 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 151 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 51 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 40 | |
| 14 | 41 | |
| 15 | 70 | |
| 16 | 84 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Peter F. Matthiessen
Peter F. Matthiessen is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Complementary and Manual Therapy and Health, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (23 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (14 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (550 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (387 citations) and Complementary and Manual Therapy (55 citations). Peter F. Matthiessen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Ostermann, Arndt Büssing, Gudrun Bornhöft, Andreas Michalsen, Ursula Wolf, Stefanie Maxion‐Bergemann, E. Neugebauer, Julia Fischer, Martin Wolf and Dirk Cysarz. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, BMC Medical Research Methodology and Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.