Peter Erfurt

479 total citations
13 papers, 358 citations indexed

About

Peter Erfurt is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Otorhinolaryngology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Erfurt has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 358 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 10 papers in Sensory Systems and 4 papers in Otorhinolaryngology. Recurrent topics in Peter Erfurt's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (11 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (10 papers) and Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (4 papers). Peter Erfurt is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (11 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (10 papers) and Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (4 papers). Peter Erfurt collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Australia and United States. Peter Erfurt's co-authors include Thomas Lenarz, Andrej Kral, Robert Briggs, Jin Xu, Timo Stöver, M. Svehla, Frank Risi, Michael Tykocinski, Ersin Avci and Lukas Aguirre Dávila and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Hearing Research and Ear and Hearing.

In The Last Decade

Peter Erfurt

12 papers receiving 349 citations

Peers

Peter Erfurt
Ersin Avci Germany
Claudiu Treaba United States
Nathaniel W. Yang Philippines
Elias Eter United States
Maja Svrakic United States
Adrian Dalbert Switzerland
Paul Boyd United Kingdom
Jim Patrick Australia
Ersin Avci Germany
Peter Erfurt
Citations per year, relative to Peter Erfurt Peter Erfurt (= 1×) peers Ersin Avci

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Erfurt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Erfurt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Erfurt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Erfurt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Erfurt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Erfurt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Erfurt. The network helps show where Peter Erfurt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Erfurt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Erfurt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Erfurt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Erfurt. Peter Erfurt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Cayé‐Thomasen, Per, et al.. (2025). Surgical Transcanal Procedure for Injection of Cells and Substances into the Human Cochlear Modiolus. Otology & Neurotology. 46(4). 476–484. 1 indexed citations
2.
Gao, Ziwen, et al.. (2024). Development of a drug delivering round window niche implant for cochlear pharmacotherapy. Drug Delivery. 31(1). 2392755–2392755. 5 indexed citations
3.
Adams, Meredith E., Waldo Nogueira, Peter Erfurt, et al.. (2023). Concept, design and evaluation of a novel electrical auditory prosthesis for direct stimulation within the auditory nerve: the Auditory Nerve Implant (ANI).. Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie. 102(S 02). S267–S267. 1 indexed citations
4.
Schurzig, Daniel, Rolf Salcher, Athanasia Warnecke, et al.. (2022). Variations in microanatomy of the human modiolus require individualized cochlear implantation. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 5047–5047. 11 indexed citations
5.
Schurzig, Daniel, et al.. (2021). A cochlear scaling model for accurate anatomy evaluation and frequency allocation in cochlear implantation. Hearing Research. 403. 108166–108166. 14 indexed citations
6.
Erfurt, Peter, et al.. (2019). Corrosion casting of the temporal bone: Review of the technique. Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger. 228. 151455–151455.
7.
Erfurt, Peter, et al.. (2019). The OpenEar library of 3D models of the human temporal bone based on computed tomography and micro-slicing. Scientific Data. 6(1). 180297–180297. 42 indexed citations
8.
Lenarz, Thomas, et al.. (2017). The Summating Potential Is a Reliable Marker of Electrode Position in Electrocochleography: Cochlear Implant as a Theragnostic Probe. Ear and Hearing. 39(4). 687–700. 20 indexed citations
9.
Dávila, Lukas Aguirre, et al.. (2017). Spiral Form of the Human Cochlea Results from Spatial Constraints. Scientific Reports. 7(1). 7500–7500. 73 indexed citations
10.
Rau, Thomas S., et al.. (2016). Insertion trauma of a cochlear implant electrode array with Nitinol inlay. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 273(11). 3573–3585. 4 indexed citations
11.
Briggs, Robert, Michael Tykocinski, Jin Xu, et al.. (2006). Comparison of Round Window and Cochleostomy Approaches with a Prototype Hearing Preservation Electrode. Audiology and Neurotology. 11(Suppl. 1). 42–48. 125 indexed citations
12.
Teschner, M., et al.. (2005). The use of buccal smears for a non-invasive screening of the 35delG mutation of the Connexin-26 gene in hearing impaired young children. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 70(6). 965–971. 1 indexed citations
13.
Issing, P. R., et al.. (2005). Evaluation of the Advance Off-Stylet Insertion Technique and the Cochlear Insertion Tool in Temporal Bones. Otology & Neurotology. 26(6). 1161–1170. 61 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026