Daniel Schurzig

772 total citations
34 papers, 592 citations indexed

About

Daniel Schurzig is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniel Schurzig has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 592 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 18 papers in Sensory Systems and 14 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Daniel Schurzig's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (28 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (18 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (14 papers). Daniel Schurzig is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (28 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (18 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (14 papers). Daniel Schurzig collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Daniel Schurzig's co-authors include Thomas Lenarz, Thomas S. Rau, Robert F. Labadie, Max Timm, Omid Majdani, Robert J. Webster, Rolf Salcher, Mary S. Dietrich, Claude Jolly and Peter Erfurt and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Daniel Schurzig

28 papers receiving 588 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daniel Schurzig Germany 14 482 332 182 126 89 34 592
Stefan Weder Switzerland 17 546 1.1× 343 1.0× 144 0.8× 167 1.3× 75 0.8× 66 708
Elsa Erixon Sweden 7 483 1.0× 405 1.2× 177 1.0× 128 1.0× 57 0.6× 10 567
Frank Risi Australia 16 691 1.4× 588 1.8× 289 1.6× 127 1.0× 79 0.9× 24 831
Philipp Mittmann Germany 17 571 1.2× 401 1.2× 247 1.4× 55 0.4× 33 0.4× 51 731
Thomas Klenzner Germany 9 812 1.7× 627 1.9× 333 1.8× 238 1.9× 67 0.8× 12 934
B. Escudé France 12 636 1.3× 496 1.5× 420 2.3× 181 1.4× 43 0.5× 17 871
George Alexiades United States 14 484 1.0× 362 1.1× 235 1.3× 113 0.9× 33 0.4× 19 694
Renato Torres France 16 338 0.7× 218 0.7× 227 1.2× 33 0.3× 56 0.6× 35 576
Marc H. Unkelbach Germany 8 550 1.1× 450 1.4× 264 1.5× 119 0.9× 46 0.5× 10 624
Ernst von Wallenberg Germany 9 680 1.4× 518 1.6× 239 1.3× 172 1.4× 45 0.5× 13 757

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Schurzig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Schurzig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Schurzig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Schurzig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Schurzig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Schurzig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Schurzig. The network helps show where Daniel Schurzig may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel Schurzig

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel Schurzig. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel Schurzig based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel Schurzig. Daniel Schurzig is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Timm, Max, et al.. (2025). Investigation of Automated Cochlear Length and Cochlear Implant Insertion Angle Predictions with a Surgical Planning Platform. Otology & Neurotology. 46(5). e161–e169. 1 indexed citations
3.
Rau, Thomas S., et al.. (2024). The role of pressure and friction forces in automated insertion of cochlear implants. Frontiers in Neurology. 15. 1430694–1430694. 2 indexed citations
4.
Schurzig, Daniel, et al.. (2024). On the interdependence of insertion forces, insertion speed, and lubrication: Aspects to consider when testing cochlear implant electrodes. PLoS ONE. 19(1). e0295121–e0295121. 4 indexed citations
6.
Schurzig, Daniel, et al.. (2022). Virtual cochlear implantation for personalized rehabilitation of profound hearing loss. Hearing Research. 429. 108687–108687. 13 indexed citations
7.
Schurzig, Daniel, Rolf Salcher, Athanasia Warnecke, et al.. (2022). Variations in microanatomy of the human modiolus require individualized cochlear implantation. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 5047–5047. 11 indexed citations
8.
Schurzig, Daniel, et al.. (2021). Uncoiling the Human Cochlea—Physical Scala Tympani Models to Study Pharmacokinetics Inside the Inner Ear. Life. 11(5). 373–373. 7 indexed citations
9.
Schurzig, Daniel, et al.. (2021). A cochlear scaling model for accurate anatomy evaluation and frequency allocation in cochlear implantation. Hearing Research. 403. 108166–108166. 14 indexed citations
10.
Schurzig, Daniel, Max Timm, Omid Majdani, Thomas Lenarz, & Thomas S. Rau. (2021). The Use of Clinically Measurable Cochlear Parameters in Cochlear Implant Surgery as Indicators for Size, Shape, and Orientation of the Scala Tympani. Ear and Hearing. 42(4). 1034–1041. 17 indexed citations
11.
Erfurt, Peter, et al.. (2019). The OpenEar library of 3D models of the human temporal bone based on computed tomography and micro-slicing. Scientific Data. 6(1). 180297–180297. 42 indexed citations
12.
Schurzig, Daniel, et al.. (2018). A Novel Method for Clinical Cochlear Duct Length Estimation toward Patient‐Specific Cochlear Implant Selection. OTO Open. 2(4). 2473974X18800238–2473974X18800238. 91 indexed citations
13.
Schurzig, Daniel, et al.. (2018). Cochlear helix and duct length identification – Evaluation of different curve fitting techniques. Cochlear Implants International. 19(5). 268–283. 39 indexed citations
14.
Schurzig, Daniel, et al.. (2016). Visualization, measurement and modelling of the cochlea using rotating midmodiolar slice planes. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 11(10). 1855–1869. 30 indexed citations
15.
Nogueira, Waldo, et al.. (2016). Validation of a Cochlear Implant Patient-Specific Model of the Voltage Distribution in a Clinical Setting. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 4. 84–84. 33 indexed citations
16.
Kratchman, Louis B., Daniel Schurzig, Theodore R. McRackan, et al.. (2012). A Manually Operated, Advance Off-Stylet Insertion Tool for Minimally Invasive Cochlear Implantation Surgery. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 59(10). 2792–2800. 19 indexed citations
17.
Schurzig, Daniel, et al.. (2011). Design of a Tool Integrating Force Sensing With Automated Insertion in Cochlear Implantation. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics. 17(2). 381–389. 46 indexed citations
18.
Balachandran, Ramya, Daniel Schurzig, J. Michael Fitzpatrick, & Robert F. Labadie. (2011). Evaluation of portable CT scanners for otologic image-guided surgery. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 7(2). 315–321. 12 indexed citations
19.
Schurzig, Daniel, Robert J. Webster, Mary S. Dietrich, & Robert F. Labadie. (2010). Force of Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Performed by a Robotic Insertion Tool. Otology & Neurotology. 31(8). 1207–1210. 47 indexed citations
20.
Majdani, Omid, et al.. (2010). Force measurement of insertion of cochlear implant electrode arrays in vitro: comparison of surgeon to automated insertion tool. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 130(1). 31–36. 76 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026