Peter Enser

1.2k citations
22 papers · 686 indexed · h-index 11

Peter Enser

20 papers receiving 602 citations

Peers

Peter Enser
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 569
  • Library and Information Sciences 15
  • Museology 29
  • Signal Processing 54
  • Information Systems 85
Replace Paolo Federico with:
Paolo Federico Austria
Gary Geisler United States
Donato Pirozzi Italy
Vassilis Poulopoulos Greece
Florian Windhager Austria
Howard Greisdorf United States
Stefan Jänicke Germany
Stephan Greene United States
Marieke Guy United Kingdom
Rao Shen United States
Peter Enser relative to Paolo Federico Austria Paolo Federico's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Paolo Federico · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Enser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Enser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Enser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Enser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Enser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Enser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Enser. The network helps show where Peter Enser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Peter Enser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Enser Line = papers co-authored together Peter Enser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 200838
2 200822
3 200713
4 200747
5 200698
6
Bridging the Semantic Gap in Multimedia Information Retrieval: Top-down and Bottom-up approaches
200634
7
The Reality of the Semantic Gap in Image Retrieval
20062
8
Surveying the reality of semantic image retrieval
20051
9 20040
10
Archival moving imagery in the digital environment
20033
11
VIRAMI: visual information retrieval for archival moving imagery
200211
12 200211
13
Separating the Eiffel Tower from the Statue of Liberty
20021
14 20018
15 20006
16 200054
17 1997185
18 1995132
19 19934
20 19858

About Peter Enser

Peter Enser is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Conservation, having authored 22 papers that have together received 686 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (15 papers), Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques (14 papers), Video Analysis and Summarization (8 papers), Multimodal Machine Learning Applications (3 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (2 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (2 papers), Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing (1 paper) and Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (569 citations), Library and Information Sciences (15 citations) and Museology (29 citations). Peter Enser has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christine J. Sandom, Paul Lewis, Jonathon Hare, Patrick Sinclair and Kirk Martinez. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Information Science, Journal of Documentation, Libri, International Journal of Information Management and Program electronic library and information systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026