Peter Clote

3.3k citations
97 papers · 2.0k indexed · h-index 23

Peter Clote

89 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Peter Clote
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 336
  • Molecular Biology 1.4k
  • Biotechnology 62
  • Artificial Intelligence 223
  • Genetics 171
Replace František Franěk with:
František Franěk Czechia
Sorin Istrail United States
Valmir C. Barbosa Brazil
Lorenz Wernisch United Kingdom
Grégory Kucherov France
Sing‐Hoi Sze United States
J. Roger Hindley United Kingdom
Guojun Li China
Marie-France Sagot France
James W. Fickett United States
Peter Clote relative to František Franěk Czechia František Franěk's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
František Franěk · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Clote

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Clote's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Clote with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Clote more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Clote

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Clote. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Clote. The network helps show where Peter Clote may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Clote, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Clote Line = papers co-authored together Peter Clote links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201520
2 20151
3 20154
4 201315
5 201318
6
Protein structure prediction on the face centered cubic lattice by local search
200823
7 20085
8 200735
9 20068
10 20065
11 2005167
12 200588
13
Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the EACSL on Computer Science Logic
20003
14
How optimal is the genetic code
199712
15 19974
16
Computation Models and Function Algebras
199635
17 199222
18
ALOGTIME and a conjecture of S.A. Cook (Extended Abstract)
19902
19 19855
20 19851

About Peter Clote

Peter Clote is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, Geometry and Topology and Mathematical Physics, having authored 97 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (49 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (32 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (29 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (18 papers), semigroups and automata theory (12 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (11 papers), Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (10 papers) and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (336 citations), Molecular Biology (1.4k citations), Biotechnology (62 citations), Artificial Intelligence (223 citations) and Genetics (171 citations). Peter Clote has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Fabrizio Ferrè, Iván Dotú, Evangelos Kranakis, Danny Kriz̧anc, Jérôme Waldispühl, Juan Antonio García-Martín, Jeffrey B. Remmel, Rolf Backofen, Yann Ponty and Bonnie Berger. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Journal of Mathematical Biology, PLoS ONE, Archive for Mathematical Logic and Journal of Computational Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026