Peter Chew

78 papers receiving 985 citations

Peers

Peter Chew
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 506
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 111
  • Gastroenterology 59
  • Reproductive Medicine 78
  • Architecture 12
Replace David Pascual with:
David Pascual United States
Maureen Laverty United States
D A Fisher United States
B.M. Jaffe United States
Fernando A. Oliveira Brazil
R. N. Hardy United Kingdom
William L. Taylor United States
Benjamin Jung Canada
Leandro P. Araújo Brazil
Pushpa Tandon United States
Peter Chew relative to David Pascual United States David Pascual's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.6×
David Pascual · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Chew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Chew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Chew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Chew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Chew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Chew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Chew. The network helps show where Peter Chew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Chew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Chew Line = papers co-authored together Peter Chew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 119 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Amino acid sequences of three bombesin-like peptides from canine intestine extracts.
1983155
2 1983139
3 200377
4 200364
5 200435
6 198134
7 199730
8 200028
9 200124
10 200423
11 200423
12 199121
13 200219
14 199419
15 198119
16 198218
17 198317
18 199115
19 199615
20 199814

About Peter Chew

Peter Chew is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery and Oncology, having authored 119 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (16 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (10 papers), Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies (7 papers), Hormonal and reproductive studies (7 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (5 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (5 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (5 papers) and Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (506 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (111 citations), Gastroenterology (59 citations), Reproductive Medicine (78 citations) and Architecture (12 citations). Peter Chew has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Joseph R. Reeve, John H. Walsh, John E. Shively, David H. Hawke, Brian Clark, David A. Keire, S. S. Ratnam, Gary M. Green, Viktor E. Eysselein and S. S. Ratnam. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Endocrinology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact