Peter Callery

99 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Peter Callery
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 446
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 880
  • Speech and Hearing 295
  • Research and Theory 25
  • Clinical Psychology 549
Replace Philip Larkin with:
Philip Larkin Ireland
Roberta L. Woodgate Canada
Frances Marcus Lewis United States
Thilo Kroll United Kingdom
Joan E. Haase United States
Päivi Åstedt‐Kurki Finland
Carina Berterö Sweden
Carmen G. Loiselle Canada
Regina Aparecida Garcia de Lima Brazil
Karl Atkin United Kingdom
Peter Callery relative to Philip Larkin Ireland Philip Larkin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Philip Larkin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Callery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Callery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Callery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Callery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Callery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Callery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Callery. The network helps show where Peter Callery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Callery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Callery Line = papers co-authored together Peter Callery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001262
2 2013147
3 2005144
4 2007124
5 2004123
6 2000123
7 2016109
8 1991104
9 200598
10 201593
11 199777
12 199773
13
Qualitative study of young people's and parents' beliefs about childhood asthma.
200369
14 200764
15 200459
16 201551
17 199749
18 201248
19 200647
20 199636

About Peter Callery

Peter Callery is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Speech and Hearing, Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and General Health Professions, having authored 101 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (22 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (16 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (14 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (14 papers), Cleft Lip and Palate Research (12 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (9 papers), Family Support in Illness (8 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (446 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (880 citations), Speech and Hearing (295 citations), Research and Theory (25 citations) and Clinical Psychology (549 citations). Peter Callery has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Wendy A. Hall, Susan Kirk, Linda Milnes, Linda S. Franck, L. D. Smith, Stephanie Tierney, Caroline Glendinning, Paula Williamson, Iain Bruce and Nicola Harman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Child Care Health and Development, The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal and Nurse Education Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026