Peter Cale
Impact in
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Species Distribution and Climate Change
Papers in
- Ecology 14
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation 9
- Avian ecology and behavior 5
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management 2
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies 10
- Co-authors
- Richard J. Hobbs (2 shared papers)James R. Miller (1 shared paper)Lesley Brooker (1 shared paper)Michael Brooker (1 shared paper)Michelle Ward (2 shared papers)David J. Eldridge (1 shared paper)Wayne S. Meyer (1 shared paper)Georgia R. Koerber (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Pacific Conservation Biology (2 papers)Ecological Applications (2 papers)Restoration Ecology (1 paper)Austral Ecology (1 paper)Journal of Ecology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter Cale
16 papers receiving 347 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 223
- Ecological Modeling 71
- Ecology 315
- Global and Planetary Change 115
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 73
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Cale
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Cale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Cale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Cale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Cale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Cale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Cale. The network helps show where Peter Cale may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Peter Cale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 106 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 79 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 53 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 47 | |
| 5 | CONDITION OF ROADSIDE VEGETATION IN RELATION TO NUTRIENT STATUS | 1991 | 41 |
| 6 | 1994 | 25 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 10 | ARE WHITE-BROWED BABBLERS TERRITORIAL? | 2002 | 4 |
| 11 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 0 |
About Peter Cale
Peter Cale is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecological Modeling, having authored 17 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (9 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (5 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (3 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers), Plant and animal studies (2 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (2 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (223 citations), Ecological Modeling (71 citations), Ecology (315 citations), Global and Planetary Change (115 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (73 citations). Peter Cale has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Hobbs, James R. Miller, Lesley Brooker, Michael Brooker, Michelle Ward, James R. Miller, David J. Eldridge, Wayne S. Meyer, Georgia R. Koerber and Cäcilia Ewenz. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Conservation Biology, Ecological Applications, Restoration Ecology, Austral Ecology and Journal of Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.