Peter C. Fisher
- Geophysics top 1%
- Artificial Intelligence top 1%
- Geochemistry and Petrology top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Mechanical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Hazel M. PrichardSarah‐Jane BarnesSarah DareC. R. NearyIain McDonaldBélinda GodelChristina Yan WangM. J. O’Hara
- Topics
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis (41 papers)Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (32 papers)Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanadaSpain
In The Last Decade
Peter C. Fisher
50 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Geophysics 1.2k
- Artificial Intelligence 842
- Geochemistry and Petrology 364
- Biomedical Engineering 155
- Mechanical Engineering 119
Countries citing papers authored by Peter C. Fisher
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter C. Fisher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter C. Fisher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter C. Fisher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter C. Fisher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter C. Fisher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter C. Fisher. The network helps show where Peter C. Fisher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter C. Fisher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter C. Fisher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter C. Fisher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter C. Fisher. Peter C. Fisher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | 44 | |
| 4 | PGM in the stillwater chromitites and implications for the magmatic processes that formed the ultramafic part of the stillwater complex | 1 |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | Platinum-group minerals in the gossan from the Key West Cu-Ni-Pt sulphide occurrence (Nevada, USA) | 2 |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 56 | |
| 10 | 127 | |
| 11 | 85 | |
| 12 | 104 | |
| 13 | 39 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 59 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | Compositional variation of laurite at Union Section in the western Bushveld Complex | 46 |
| 19 | 30 | |
| 20 | Minerales del grupo del platino y fases asociadas en el depósito de Ni-Cu-(EGP) de Aguablanca, SW España | 9 |
About Peter C. Fisher
Peter C. Fisher is a scholar working on Geophysics, Geochemistry and Petrology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (41 papers), Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (32 papers) and Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (1.2k citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (364 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (842 citations). Peter C. Fisher has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Hazel M. Prichard, Sarah‐Jane Barnes, Sarah Dare, C. R. Neary, Iain McDonald, Bélinda Godel, Christina Yan Wang, M. J. O’Hara, R. A. Cox and Mei‐Fu Zhou. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta and Environmental Pollution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.