Peter Burns

937 citations
14 papers · 555 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Burns

12 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

Peter Burns
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Sociology and Political Science 487
  • Political Science and International Relations 200
  • Law 45
  • Communication 25
  • Clinical Psychology 67
Replace Gerald E. Dirks with:
Gerald E. Dirks Canada
Joel S. Fetzer United States
Harold E. Pepinsky United States
Elizabeth F. Cohen United States
Dietrich Thränhardt Germany
Randall Kennedy United States
Ian Loader United Kingdom
Serhat Karakayalı Germany
Aogán Mulcahy Ireland
Paul Takagi United States
Peter Burns relative to Gerald E. Dirks Canada Gerald E. Dirks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Gerald E. Dirks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Burns

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Burns's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Burns with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Burns more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Burns

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Burns. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Burns. The network helps show where Peter Burns may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Peter Burns, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Burns Line = papers co-authored together Peter Burns links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2000457
2 200444
3 198931
4 19896
5
Criminal injuries compensation: Social remedy or political palliative for victims of crime?
19803
6 19833
7
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: Constitutional Bulwark or Colonial Remnant?
19842
8 19742
9
The Good Neighbour on Trial: Good Neighbours Make Bad Law
19832
10
The United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment: How it is Still Better to Light a Candle than to Curse the Darkness?
19981
11
Civil Conspiracy: An Unwieldy Vessel Rides a Judicial Tempest
19821
12
THE LAW AND PRIVACY: THE CANADIAN EXPERIENCE
19761
13 19781
14
A casebook in the law of crimes
19681

About Peter Burns

Peter Burns is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and Anthropology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 555 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Legal principles and applications (5 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (2 papers), International Law and Aviation (1 paper), Freedom of Expression and Defamation (1 paper), Land Rights and Reforms (1 paper), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (1 paper), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (1 paper) and Torture, Ethics, and Law (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (487 citations), Political Science and International Relations (200 citations), Law (45 citations), Communication (25 citations) and Clinical Psychology (67 citations). Peter Burns has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include James G. Gimpel, J. C. Smith and Obiora Chinedu Okafor. Their work appears in journals such as Indonesia, Political Science Quarterly, Modern Law Review, The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law and Alberta Law Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact