Péter Bodrogi

80 papers receiving 980 citations

Peers

Péter Bodrogi
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Social Psychology 659
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 668
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 343
  • Global and Planetary Change 288
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 147
Replace Kevin Smet with:
Kevin Smet Belgium
J. Schanda Hungary
Wouter Ryckaert Belgium
Minchen Wei Hong Kong
Michael Royer United States
Hyeon‐Jeong Suk South Korea
Kevin W. Houser United States
Kaida Xiao United Kingdom
Susan F. te Pas Netherlands
Christopher Cuttle New Zealand
Péter Bodrogi relative to Kevin Smet Belgium Kevin Smet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Kevin Smet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Péter Bodrogi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Péter Bodrogi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Péter Bodrogi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Péter Bodrogi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Péter Bodrogi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Péter Bodrogi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Péter Bodrogi. The network helps show where Péter Bodrogi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Péter Bodrogi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Péter Bodrogi Line = papers co-authored together Péter Bodrogi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200975
2 200758
3 200554
4 200945
5 201544
6 201641
7 200140
8 201637
9
Colour Rendering of white LED Light Sources
200735
10 200831
11 201630
12 201530
13 200330
14 201025
15
Why does the CIE Colour Rendering Index fail for white RGB LED light sources
200424
16 201723
17 200721
18 200321
19 201120
20 201818

About Péter Bodrogi

Péter Bodrogi is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Global and Planetary Change and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 85 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Color Science and Applications (64 papers), Color perception and design (50 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (27 papers), Impact of Light on Environment and Health (24 papers), Building Energy and Comfort Optimization (4 papers), Image Enhancement Techniques (4 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (4 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (659 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (668 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (343 citations), Global and Planetary Change (288 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (147 citations). Péter Bodrogi has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Hungary and China. Frequent co-authors include TQ Khanh, J. Schanda, Tran Quoc Khanh, Ferenc Szabó, Stefan Brückner, Helen C. Walkey, Liisa Halonen, Marjukka Eloholma, Yandan Lin and J.W.A.M. Alferdinck. Their work appears in journals such as Lighting Research & Technology, Color Research & Application, Displays, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact