J. Schanda

73 papers receiving 877 citations

Peers

J. Schanda
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Social Psychology 449
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 593
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 228
  • Global and Planetary Change 175
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 158
Replace Péter Bodrogi with:
Péter Bodrogi Germany
Wouter Ryckaert Belgium
Michael Royer United States
Haisong Xu China
Ming Ronnier Luo China
Ming Ronnier Luo China
Yoshinobu Nayatani Japan
Kevin Smet Belgium
William A. Thornton United States
Javier Romero Spain
J. Schanda relative to Péter Bodrogi Germany Péter Bodrogi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Péter Bodrogi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Schanda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Schanda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Schanda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Schanda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Schanda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Schanda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Schanda. The network helps show where J. Schanda may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Schanda, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Schanda Line = papers co-authored together J. Schanda links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201386
2 197783
3 200682
4 200975
5 200159
6 200945
7 198530
8 201426
9 200425
10 201524
11
Why does the CIE Colour Rendering Index fail for white RGB LED light sources
200424
12 200223
13 200823
14 201522
15 201222
16 197822
17 200920
18 201418
19 201417
20 198215

About J. Schanda

J. Schanda is a scholar working on Nuclear Energy and Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 84 papers that have together received 968 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Color Science and Applications (49 papers), Color perception and design (31 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (14 papers), Impact of Light on Environment and Health (14 papers), Image Enhancement Techniques (11 papers), Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties (10 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (4 papers) and Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (449 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (593 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (228 citations), Global and Planetary Change (175 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (158 citations). J. Schanda has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Péter Bodrogi, Ferenc Szabó, Noémi Sándor, Lorne Whitehead, Kevin Smet, Cecília Sik‐Lányi, M. Gál, Ronnier Luo, Mark S. Rea and P.L. Walraven. Their work appears in journals such as Color Research & Application, Lighting Research & Technology, Displays, physica status solidi (b) and Journal of Luminescence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026