Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery
2012320 citationsPertti LahdenperäConstruction Management and Economicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Pertti Lahdenperä
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Pertti Lahdenperä's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pertti Lahdenperä with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pertti Lahdenperä more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pertti Lahdenperä
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pertti Lahdenperä. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pertti Lahdenperä. The network helps show where Pertti Lahdenperä may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pertti Lahdenperä
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pertti Lahdenperä.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pertti Lahdenperä based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Pertti Lahdenperä. Pertti Lahdenperä is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Vehmas, Tapio, et al.. (2018). Quality Management of Concrete Construction by Digitalizing the Process Chain from Batching Plant to Building. 68–76.3 indexed citations
Lahdenperä, Pertti. (2011). Towards the use of project alliance: Joint development of a team selection procedure as an example of steps taken. Research Repository (Delft University of Technology).2 indexed citations
Rigby, John, David Lowe, Roger Courtney, et al.. (2009). Study on voluntary arrangements for collaborative working in the field of construction services [Contract No SI2.ICNPROCE015827500] Final Report Part 1: Main Report. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).1 indexed citations
15.
Lahdenperä, Pertti. (2007). Innovaatioita edistämässä: Lähtökohtia ja ajatuksia rakennus- ja infra-alan hankintamallien kehittämiseen.1 indexed citations
16.
Lahdenperä, Pertti, et al.. (2004). Road sector experiences on project delivery methods.8 indexed citations
17.
Lahdenperä, Pertti, et al.. (2004). The current and future performance of road project delivery methods.18 indexed citations
18.
Lahdenperä, Pertti. (2001). Design-Build Procedures: Introduction, illustration and comparison of U.S. modes.5 indexed citations
19.
Lahdenperä, Pertti. (2001). An analysis of the statistics on project procurement methods in Finland, 1989 - 1998. 7(1). 27–41.1 indexed citations
20.
Hannus, Matti, et al.. (1997). Methodologies for systematic improving of construction processes. 55–64.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.