Percy A. Scholes
- Music top 5%
- Literature and Literary Theory
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Signal Processing
- Topics
- Historical Influence and Diplomacy (2 papers)Diverse Music Education Insights (1 paper)Historical Art and Culture Studies (1 paper)
- Journals
- NotesThe Musical TimesMedical Entomology and Zoology
In The Last Decade
Percy A. Scholes
10 papers receiving 36 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Music 22
- Literature and Literary Theory 11
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 10
- Cognitive Neuroscience 9
- Signal Processing 9
Countries citing papers authored by Percy A. Scholes
This map shows the geographic impact of Percy A. Scholes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Percy A. Scholes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Percy A. Scholes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Percy A. Scholes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Percy A. Scholes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Percy A. Scholes. The network helps show where Percy A. Scholes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Percy A. Scholes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Percy A. Scholes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Percy A. Scholes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Percy A. Scholes. Percy A. Scholes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Puritans And Music In England And New England | 3 |
| 2 | The Book of the Great Musicians: A Course in Appreciation for Young Readers | 0 |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | Everyman and His Music; Simple Papers on Varied Subjects | 0 |
| 5 | An eighteenth-century musical tour in Central Europe and the Netherlands: Being Dr. Charles Burney's account of his musical experiences | 3 |
| 6 | An eighteenth-century musical tour in France and Italy : being Dr. Charles Burney's account of his musical experiences as it appears in his published volume with which are incorporated his travel experiences according to his original intention | 3 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 16 |
About Percy A. Scholes
Percy A. Scholes is a scholar working on Music, Museology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 15 papers that have together received 67 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Influence and Diplomacy (2 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (1 paper) and Historical Art and Culture Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (22 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (5 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (11 citations). Frequent co-authors include Charles W. Fox, Charles Burney, Eric Blom and Richard S. Hill. Their work appears in journals such as Notes, The Musical Times and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.