Peng Lin

59 papers receiving 584 citations

Peers

Peng Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Polymers and Plastics 80
  • Catalysis 36
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 89
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering 2
  • Biomedical Engineering 165
Replace Jinning Zhang with:
Jinning Zhang China
Waleed Khalid Al‐Azzawi Iraq
Xinxin Zou China
Chunhua Zheng China
Yuanliang Li China
Xudong Guo China
Kang Chen China
Lei Ren China
Tianyi Tao China
Peng Lin relative to Jinning Zhang China Jinning Zhang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jinning Zhang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peng Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peng Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peng Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peng Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peng Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peng Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peng Lin. The network helps show where Peng Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peng Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peng Lin Line = papers co-authored together Peng Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202362
2 200856
3 202451
4 202239
5 202338
6 201430
7 202026
8 202425
9 202323
10 202220
11 201419
12 202419
13 201215
14 201514
15 202312
16 202412
17 202311
18 201211
19 20148
20 20208

About Peng Lin

Peng Lin is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 68 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (7 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (6 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (6 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (5 papers), Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies (4 papers), Green IT and Sustainability (3 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (3 papers) and Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Polymers and Plastics (80 citations), Catalysis (36 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (89 citations), Nuclear Energy and Engineering (2 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (165 citations). Peng Lin has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gang Sui, Xiaoping Yang, Qiuxiang Yang, Xia Cao, Zhong Lin Wang, Huijing Xiang, Xia Liao, Hexin Zhang, Zaihui Fu and Dulin Yin. Their work appears in journals such as ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, Waves in Random and Complex Media, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules and Frontiers in Plant Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact