Peng Cai
About
In The Last Decade
Peng Cai
32 papers receiving 429 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Molecular Biology 269
- Cancer Research 208
- Plant Science 104
- Surgery 66
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 31
Countries citing papers authored by Peng Cai
This map shows the geographic impact of Peng Cai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peng Cai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peng Cai more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peng Cai
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peng Cai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peng Cai. The network helps show where Peng Cai may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peng Cai
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peng Cai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peng Cai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peng Cai. Peng Cai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 32 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 9 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.