Penelope Smyth

45 papers receiving 377 citations

Peers

Penelope Smyth
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 209
  • Neurology 35
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 33
  • Immunology 30
  • Rehabilitation 8
Replace Christoph Thalheim with:
Christoph Thalheim United Kingdom
Muhteşem Gedizlioğlu Türkiye
Stefania De Mercanti Italy
Eve Overton United States
Giuseppina Miele Italy
Antonio Martı́nez-Yélamos Spain
Amy Perrin Ross United States
Olivier Heinzlef France
Virginia Devonshire Canada
Mia Gannedahl Austria
Penelope Smyth relative to Christoph Thalheim United Kingdom Christoph Thalheim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Christoph Thalheim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Penelope Smyth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Penelope Smyth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Penelope Smyth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Penelope Smyth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Penelope Smyth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Penelope Smyth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Penelope Smyth. The network helps show where Penelope Smyth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Penelope Smyth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Penelope Smyth Line = papers co-authored together Penelope Smyth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201491
2 201437
3 201624
4 201819
5 202218
6 201916
7 202114
8 201612
9 201811
10 202110
11 202210
12 20249
13 20229
14 20218
15 20196
16 20166
17 20216
18 20036
19 20205
20 20235

About Penelope Smyth

Penelope Smyth is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Oncology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 384 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (28 papers), Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments (4 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Polyomavirus and related diseases (3 papers), Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders (3 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (209 citations), Neurology (35 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (33 citations), Immunology (30 citations) and Rehabilitation (8 citations). Penelope Smyth has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include A. Dessa Sadovnick, Maria K. Houtchens, Riley Bove, Helen Tremlett, Kerstin Hellwig, Derek Emery, Jan M. Friedman, Ellen Lu, Gideon Koren and Thomas F. McElrath. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, Neurology, Frontiers in Neurology and NMR in Biomedicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact