Peigen Xiao
Impact in
-
- Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Pharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds
Papers in
-
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 31
-
- Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis 35
- Medicinal plant effects and applications 10
- Co-authors
- Lijia Xu (33 shared papers)Chunnian He (31 shared papers)Yong Peng (15 shared papers)Da‐Cheng Hao (14 shared papers)Wenyuan Gao (20 shared papers)Minhui Li (7 shared papers)Ling Yang (2 shared papers)Jun‐Shan Yang (10 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Ethnopharmacology (13 papers)Starch - Stärke (7 papers)Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin (7 papers)Phytotherapy Research (6 papers)Phytochemistry (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaHong KongUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peigen Xiao
185 papers receiving 5.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
- Complementary and alternative medicine 1.2k
- Pharmacology 620
- Biochemistry 379
- Pharmacology 859
- Food Science 650
Countries citing papers authored by Peigen Xiao
This map shows the geographic impact of Peigen Xiao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peigen Xiao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peigen Xiao more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peigen Xiao
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peigen Xiao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peigen Xiao. The network helps show where Peigen Xiao may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peigen Xiao, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 190 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 458 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 222 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 163 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 156 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 132 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 124 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 113 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 103 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 92 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 87 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 85 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 82 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 74 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 73 | |
| 15 | 2016 | 71 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 71 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 70 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 69 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 67 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 67 |
About Peigen Xiao
Peigen Xiao is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Plant Science, Pharmacology and Pharmacology, having authored 190 papers that have together received 5.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (36 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (35 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (31 papers), Food composition and properties (15 papers), Tea Polyphenols and Effects (14 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (11 papers), Medicinal plant effects and applications (10 papers) and Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (1.2k citations), Pharmacology (620 citations), Biochemistry (379 citations), Pharmacology (859 citations) and Food Science (650 citations). Peigen Xiao has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Lijia Xu, Chunnian He, Yong Peng, Da‐Cheng Hao, Wenyuan Gao, Minhui Li, Ling Yang, Jun‐Shan Yang, Yong Peng and S LI. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ethnopharmacology, Starch - Stärke, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, Phytotherapy Research and Phytochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.