Pei Jing

492 citations
25 papers · 383 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

    • Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research 4
    • Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms 2
    • Plant Molecular Biology Research 2

Pei Jing

24 papers receiving 380 citations

Peers

Pei Jing
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Pharmaceutical Science 31
  • Biomaterials 53
  • Neurology 28
  • Biochemistry 23
  • Developmental Neuroscience 11
Replace Xinxin Wang with:
Xinxin Wang China
Sora Lee South Korea
Daniela Triolo Italy
Weiqiang Jia China
Kate Fisher United Kingdom
Serhii Vakal Finland
Joseph G. Moloughney United States
Fancai Zeng China
Pei Jing relative to Xinxin Wang China Xinxin Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Xinxin Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pei Jing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pei Jing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pei Jing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pei Jing more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pei Jing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pei Jing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pei Jing. The network helps show where Pei Jing may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pei Jing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pei Jing Line = papers co-authored together Pei Jing links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202144
2 201643
3 201339
4 201632
5 202232
6 202029
7 202128
8 202423
9 202215
10 202212
11 202311
12 201511
13 202211
14 201510
15 20239
16 20228
17 20246
18 20234
19 20234
20 20233

About Pei Jing

Pei Jing is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Organic Chemistry, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 25 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research (4 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers), Spinal Cord Injury Research (3 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (3 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (2 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (2 papers) and Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmaceutical Science (31 citations), Biomaterials (53 citations), Neurology (28 citations), Biochemistry (23 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (11 citations). Pei Jing has collaborated with scholars based in China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Guosheng Xie, Chunyan Liao, Zhirong Zhong, Shiyong Zhang, Jun Yang, Zhongbing Liu, Liang Wang, Meiling Zhou, Yunlong Yu and Jingxuan Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Engineering Journal, Drug Delivery and Translational Research, Molecular Pharmaceutics, Neurochemical Research and The Plant Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact