Peer von Döhren
About
In The Last Decade
Peer von Döhren
6 papers receiving 365 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Global and Planetary Change 289
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 233
- Environmental Engineering 93
- Plant Science 87
- Ecology 40
Countries citing papers authored by Peer von Döhren
This map shows the geographic impact of Peer von Döhren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peer von Döhren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peer von Döhren more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peer von Döhren
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peer von Döhren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peer von Döhren. The network helps show where Peer von Döhren may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peer von Döhren
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peer von Döhren. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peer von Döhren based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peer von Döhren. Peer von Döhren is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | 303 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.