Pedro J. Montero
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Geophysics top 10%
- Computational Mechanics
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- José A. FontThomas W. BaumgarteLuciano RezzollaN. Sanchis-GualEwald MüllerJuan Carlos DegolladoI. Cordero-CarriónNikolaos Stergioulas
- Topics
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (19 papers)Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (18 papers)Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySpainUnited States
In The Last Decade
Pedro J. Montero
24 papers receiving 886 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 881
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 440
- Geophysics 78
- Computational Mechanics 29
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 27
Countries citing papers authored by Pedro J. Montero
This map shows the geographic impact of Pedro J. Montero's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pedro J. Montero with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pedro J. Montero more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pedro J. Montero
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pedro J. Montero. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pedro J. Montero. The network helps show where Pedro J. Montero may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pedro J. Montero
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pedro J. Montero. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pedro J. Montero based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pedro J. Montero. Pedro J. Montero is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30 | |
| 2 | 112 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 52 | |
| 14 | 50 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 209 | |
| 19 | 62 | |
| 20 | 29 |
About Pedro J. Montero
Pedro J. Montero is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Geophysics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 908 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (19 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (18 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (881 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (440 citations) and Geophysics (78 citations). Pedro J. Montero has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include José A. Font, Thomas W. Baumgarte, Luciano Rezzolla, N. Sanchis-Gual, Ewald Müller, Juan Carlos Degollado, I. Cordero-Carrión, Nikolaos Stergioulas, Carlos Herdeiro and Luca Baiotti. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Physical review. D.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.