Peder Aspen

506 citations
13 papers · 451 · h-index 11

Impact in

  • Geophysics top 5%
    • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
    • earthquake and tectonic studies
    • High-pressure geophysics and materials
    • Mineralogy and Gemology Studies
    • Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis

Papers in

    • Geological and Geochemical Analysis 11
    • earthquake and tectonic studies 9
    • High-pressure geophysics and materials 7
    • Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils 2

Peder Aspen

13 papers receiving 423 citations

Peers

Peder Aspen
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Geophysics 428
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 101
  • Paleontology 45
  • Geology 21
  • Artificial Intelligence 101
Replace Claudio C. Milisenda with:
Claudio C. Milisenda Germany
R. Capdevila France
B. Cabanis France
Gerry Ingram United Kingdom
Wayne T. Jolly Canada
W. R. Church Canada
Alain Potrel France
E. Wulff-Pedersen Norway
Ruth Lanyon Australia
S. Keay Australia
Peder Aspen relative to Claudio C. Milisenda Germany Claudio C. Milisenda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Claudio C. Milisenda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peder Aspen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peder Aspen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peder Aspen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peder Aspen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peder Aspen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peder Aspen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peder Aspen. The network helps show where Peder Aspen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Peder Aspen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peder Aspen Line = papers co-authored together Peder Aspen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1999100
2 198387
3 199072
4 198440
5 200127
6 197626
7 198424
8 198424
9 199817
10 200314
11 200212
12 19927
13 19751

About Peder Aspen

Peder Aspen is a scholar working on Geophysics, Paleontology, Geochemistry and Petrology, Atmospheric Science and Earth-Surface Processes, having authored 13 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (11 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (9 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (7 papers), Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (2 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (2 papers), Geological formations and processes (2 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (2 papers) and Geological and Geophysical Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (428 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (101 citations), Paleontology (45 citations), Geology (21 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (101 citations). Peder Aspen has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Czechia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include B. G. J. Upton, Neil A. Chapman, R. W. Hinton, Alan P. Dickin, Robert H. Hunter, John W. Valley, Adrian A. Finch, Alex N. Halliday, M. Aftalion and Neil D. L. Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Geological Society, Geological Magazine, Nature, Journal of Petrology and European Journal of Mineralogy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact