Paul M. Chesler
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 1%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Computational Mechanics
- Co-authors
- Laurence G. YaffeAllan AdamsKrishna RajagopalKristan JensenAndreas KarchHong LiuAbraham LoebDerek Teaney
- Topics
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (32 papers)Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (26 papers)High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandAustria
In The Last Decade
Paul M. Chesler
35 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.5k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.1k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 306
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 130
- Computational Mechanics 59
Countries citing papers authored by Paul M. Chesler
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul M. Chesler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul M. Chesler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul M. Chesler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul M. Chesler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul M. Chesler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul M. Chesler. The network helps show where Paul M. Chesler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul M. Chesler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul M. Chesler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul M. Chesler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul M. Chesler. Paul M. Chesler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 49 | |
| 9 | 59 | |
| 10 | 52 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 198 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 48 | |
| 17 | 53 | |
| 18 | 237 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 76 |
About Paul M. Chesler
Paul M. Chesler is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (32 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (26 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.5k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.1k citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (130 citations). Paul M. Chesler has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Laurence G. Yaffe, Allan Adams, Krishna Rajagopal, Kristan Jensen, Andreas Karch, Hong Liu, Abraham Loeb, Derek Teaney, Simon Caron-Huot and Andrew Lucas. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Physical Review Letters and Journal of High Energy Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.