Paul H. Sisco
- Plant Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics top 10%
- Endocrinology top 5%
- Cell Biology
- Co-authors
- Stephen P. MooseC. W. StuberMargaret StatonAlbert G. AbbottDavid HoisingtonMichel RagotJohn E. CarlsonRonald R. Sederoff
- Topics
- Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (15 papers)Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (8 papers)Horticultural and Viticultural Research (8 papers)
- Cited by
- EndocrinologyPlant ScienceGenetics
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyAustralia
In The Last Decade
Paul H. Sisco
24 papers receiving 814 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
- Plant Science 699
- Molecular Biology 382
- Genetics 240
- Endocrinology 156
- Cell Biology 104
Countries citing papers authored by Paul H. Sisco
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul H. Sisco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul H. Sisco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul H. Sisco more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul H. Sisco
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul H. Sisco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul H. Sisco. The network helps show where Paul H. Sisco may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul H. Sisco
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul H. Sisco. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul H. Sisco based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul H. Sisco. Paul H. Sisco is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 93 | |
| 8 | Screening for resistance to Phytophthora cinnamomi in hybrid seedlings of American chestnut. | 12 |
| 9 | Outlook for blight-resistant American chestnut trees | 0 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 192 | |
| 12 | 43 | |
| 13 | 107 | |
| 14 | 113 | |
| 15 | Probes for the b-32 protein hybridize to loci on 7L and 8L. | 1 |
| 16 | Acp4 Is the Most Distal Marker on Chromosome lL | 1 |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Paul H. Sisco
Paul H. Sisco is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Plant Science and Cell Biology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 861 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (15 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (8 papers) and Horticultural and Viticultural Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (156 citations), Plant Science (699 citations) and Genetics (240 citations). Paul H. Sisco has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Stephen P. Moose, C. W. Stuber, Margaret Staton, Albert G. Abbott, David Hoisington, Michel Ragot, John E. Carlson, Ronald R. Sederoff, Giovanni G. Vendramin and Tetyana Zhebentyayeva. Their work appears in journals such as Genes & Development, The Plant Cell and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.