Paul H. Douglas

23 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers

Paul H. Douglas
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Economics and Econometrics 237
  • Sociology and Political Science 119
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 67
  • Political Science and International Relations 50
  • Global and Planetary Change 48
Replace William E. Griffith with:
William E. Griffith United States
P. J. Lund United Kingdom
Wolfgang Peters Germany
Ronald N. Johnson United States
Satya Paul Australia
Ying Ge China
Euston Quah Singapore
Donald J. Lacombe United States
Philip Adams Australia
Daniel C. Knudsen United States
Paul H. Douglas relative to William E. Griffith United States William E. Griffith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
William E. Griffith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul H. Douglas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul H. Douglas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul H. Douglas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul H. Douglas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul H. Douglas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul H. Douglas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul H. Douglas. The network helps show where Paul H. Douglas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul H. Douglas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul H. Douglas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul H. Douglas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul H. Douglas. Paul H. Douglas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 29
3 11
4
Wages and the family
1
5 0
6
Statistical analysis of the output rates of two variable bit-rate video coders
5
7
A Selection of Hebrew Melodies, Ancient and Modern, by Isaac Nathan and Lord Byron
3
8 8
9 263
10
In the fullness of time;: The memoirs of Paul H. Douglas
14
11 162
12
The urban environment : how it can be improved
1
13
How big should government be
3
14
In our time
1
15
The water crisis
20
16
Bosses in lusty Chicago : the story of Bathhouse John and Hinky Dink
4
17 1
18 7
19 4
20 1

About Paul H. Douglas

Paul H. Douglas is a scholar working on Music, Public Administration and Religious studies, having authored 28 papers that have together received 579 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Data Compression Techniques (2 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity (1 paper) and Music History and Culture (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (237 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (67 citations) and Gender Studies (29 citations). Paul H. Douglas has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence M. Kiage, Frank Moss, Martin Vetterli, Yang Cao, Kamla Dutt, Gunnar Karlsson, J. Enoch Powell, Albert Rees, B. Sathish Mohan and Frederick Burwick. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Finance, Journal of the American Statistical Association and The Science of The Total Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026